The Dangers of Nuclear Radiation

Bogdahn Vasyutynskyy


To many people around America, the events of nuclear accidents such as Chernobyl stand just as a historical event, but they do not think about how devastating the aftermath of Chernobyl was. During the events of the Chernobyl accident, my mother was in a close one hundred mile radius in Kiev, Ukraine. The government had repressed word of Chernobyl until around May 5th, and every single child was being hustled out of Kiev and sent onto trains to other towns. Every building in Kiev was being hosed down and washed to combat any type of radiation. My uncle during this time was in the army and had been tasked with the mission of cleaning up areas around Chernobyl. To combat tragic events like this ever happening again, the populace should first be informed of how dangerous nuclear radiation can be.

Chernobyl was the first event in human history in which people had died from radiation related issues. How it had happened was due to poor management by the hands of the Soviets and nuclear reactor designs that were dangerous. During the accident, the Chernobyl 4 Reactor had been destroyed, killing numerous first responders instantly. Overtime, 29 firemen had died due to short term exposure of radiation. If design of the nuclear reactors was safe and ready to go, a tragedy could have been prevented.

With the effects of Chernobyl, there has been a discussion of mutated animals due to radiation. A lot of these animals live in the Chernobyl exclusion zone which no humans inhabit, and their radiation is spreading to the rest of Europe. Contaminated animals such as barn swallows can spread disgusting mutations to the next generation of animals, and can radiate the environment through their movements. Smaller animals in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone suffer greatly from the radiation. Exposure to this radiation has resulted in tumors, smaller brains, and cataracts. Animals that stay around in this area can sustain horrible genetic damage. The suffering these animals endure is morally reprehensible and has drastic effects on new generations.

While the accident at Chernobyl has a relatively low body count compared to other tragedies, the long term and short term effects of its radiation are evident. People had died within a matter of months due to exposure of radiation, and animals today still lurk in the large exclusion zone, developing horrible mutations that could result in mutations in further generations. The ionizing radiation from Chernobyl had damaged the genetic material of reproductive cells and resulted in mutations passed on from generation to generation.


How do we ensure that tragedies such as Chernobyl will never happen again?
How will we take precautions?
How do we minimize radiation to pass through populations?

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think the most important thing that needed to be done in the Chernobyl incident was more trials and tests to ensure that the reactor was functioning correctly. Instead, the Soviet Union decided to continue the dangerous plans. Some precautions that maybe taken is potentially spraying residential areas with radiation protection in areas that could be exposed to radiation. This way, residents will have a temporary shield against radiation if another accident were to occur. Major precautions have been taken since the accident, such as backup generators and ways to cool the reactor. Also, nuclear facilities have started to be placed in sparsely populated areas to make sure that the number of people exposed is minimized. It is hard to stop radiation from passing through populations, as once the radiation is not contained it is hard to clean up. As you mentioned, animals are spreading their mutations because of the Chernobyl accident.
Anonymous said…
The ways we can ensure that events such as Chernobyl never happens is to not rely so heavily on humans as it was a result of human error. Now of course the saying goes we’re only human but we act like we rule and understand everything. If the Soviet Union was more careful and calculated the risks of taking out and putting the control-rods in faster, the whole ordeal could’ve been reversed and never put as an example. Most countries have already been trying to reduce this human error and are substantially stricter in terms of time and what happens in a orderly manner and leave no room for even a minimal error. Honestly I would propose to throw the human aspect out of it but knowing the unreliability of technology at times, that could be even more catastrophic. We need to utilize the majority control to technology in areas where errors can be created by humans and people are to manage and monitor the rest.
Anonymous said…
To ensure that events like Chernobyl never happen again, we must take extra precautions on anything that may be dangerous. Engineering errors and general calculation errors can happen at any time. Better training and awareness will also help so that we can shut down a situation and know what to do in events where things don’t go as planned. Lack of enough knowledge might also cause bad decision making in higher staff members, so they should be fully trained and selected carefully. Engineers doing an experiement in which they lowered control rods caused this entire ordeal where one thing led to the next.
Anonymous said…
When speaking about nuclear power in any way, we will always need to take precautions to ensure that no disasters will ever happen again. Nuclear energy in my opinion is not as sustainable and would be more of a threat to use with the nuclear waste. I feel that if we capitalize on renewable and nondepletable resources, we could survive without the need for nuclear energy. We could avoid cherynobl by not using nuclear energy at all.
Anonymous said…
The most important thing to do is to prevent future incidents such as this one. Taking extremely necessary precautions will help to prevent the incident before it happens. If one does occur, the general population should be notified immediately so people can evacuate or at least prepare for the inevitable. Mistakes happen, and everyone should know exactly what happened and what they can do to minimize the effects. Nuclear energy is very dangerous in the first place, but with storms and hurricanes and tsunamis getting more and more extreme, the risks of nuclear power plants being damaged is greater and greater. We should expect this and prepare for the worst, but we should also try everything we can do to prevent the incident before it happens.
Anonymous said…
I feel like there is so much risk in nuclear energy that it almost outweighs the reward. Sure, nuclear energy is crazy good for generating electricity. But if you turn your back on it for too long, it will cause a huge crisis. When a solar panel malfunctions, you send someone to fix it. Same thing with a wind turbine. Nuclear energy requires extreme caution by numerous people to just keep it from getting worse. Nuclear energy has a point where if it gets too bad, there is no way to go back. None of the other renewable resources really have something like that.
Anonymous said…
Chernobyl was one of the most devastating nuclear incidents in history. Although not many individuals died, the impacts on the environment were drastic. It takes around 300 years for radioactive waste to decay, and it makes the land utterly unlivable. Some ways that we can makes sure that this tragedy doesn’t happen again is through stricter regulations regarding nuclear power plants. While constructing these infrastructures, the government should ensure that no short cuts were taken to reduce costs. Regulations and inspections should be regularly implemented to make sure that these plants are up to par. Additionally, scientists should start doing research to construct a plant that doesn’t solely rely on the cooling system as a prevention of a meltdown. There should be multiple back ups for these plants to prevent the devastating possibility of a meltdown.
Anonymous said…
Even though the earthquake and tsunami could not have been prevented, better foresight and training would surely have mitigated its consequences and possibly prevented the nuclear core meltdowns altogether We need to take more precautions by runing more trials to test the accuracy. Human errors was the key fault so we can take precautions by ensuring that they have done trials in every aspect on the power plants before an actual test. Protective suits keep radioactive isotopes out of your body, but cannot shield you against the ionizing radiation. But, to completely minimize radiation to pass through for generations it is important to make sure the workers are wearing proper safety equipment and is not spending more time than needed close to the nuclear power plants.
Anonymous said…
I agree with Rishit’s statement on how the earthquakes could not have been prevented, but the people in those plants could have been trained on how to deal with this situation better, so then we wouldn’t be facing these consequences decades into the future. Radiation is a very dangerous thing, and if governments don’t treat them with the proper equipment and training needed, we could face another catastrophe similar to Chernobyl in the near future. We need to do our part so we can thrive here on this planet.
Anonymous said…
We all should acknowledge the importance of being careful in regards to nuclear powers. Chernobyl event has already proven to us that if the nuclear power is not properly handled, it could bring disastrous result to our community. In my opinion, Nuclear power is something that could potentially be revolutionary as well as efficient as an energy source. However if not handled well, it could be a disaster instead. Therefore I think we should be extremely careful with making decisions in regards to nuclear power.
Anonymous said…
I think that putting more money into experiments and research/development will help us ensure that nuclear accidents such as chenobyl can be prevented. Furthermore, we need strict sets of rules to follow in case of a meltdown, in order to ensure that people are not hurt. Research and Devleopment will help us find ways to fix the small flaws we have with our current nuclear energy system, and be able to use it in a more sustainable way in the future. Furthermore, I think that we should have a good backup system in the case that these plants fail, and a meltdown might occur.
Anonymous said…
While Nuclear power does pose some risks, I still think we should stick with it given how effective it is. It is also worth noting that major nuclear accidents are extremely rare. When it comes down to it, the Chernobyl accident occurred in part due to human error. Countries that continue to build nuclear power plants need to invest in extensive programs to teach workers how to deal with a wide range of possible problems they may encounter while working at the power plant. If a Nuclear accident does happen, an emergency alert system would be effective way to give people a heads up that they need to evacuate.
Anonymous said…
Ways to prevent nuclear disasters such as Chernobyl and Fukushima include stabilizing the electricity supply system, storing spent fuel in dry casks, preventing sabotage in nuclear facilities, and building nuclear facilities in safe areas AWAY from the shore in the case of Fukushima. According to the World Nuclear Association, nuclear power is the world’s most concentrated energy source.
Anonymous said…
Education! Education! Education! With education to the population people can learn what is needed to be done to minimize the lasting effects from Chernobyl, and other radioactive sites. To prevent the tragedy from repeating, we need to make sure that both the location, and the facilities themselves are at the safest level possible. The placement of Fukushima was the first mistake, the costal area of a tsunami and earthquake area was an unstable choice. Back up power needs to be something that will absolutely work if/when it is needed no exceptions.
Anonymous said…
I think that nuclear energy is a great way to make cleaner power than fossil fuels, yet it can be extremely dangerous. We need to be extra careful when usuing energy like this. TO prevent nuclear disasters like Chernobyl, we need to take into account the georgraphy of the area chosen for the plant, and what is around it. If there are houses or work places close to the reactor, maybe those buildings could be sprayed with radiation safe material or more barriers could be placed in between the reactor and the outside. We need to be careful with making nuclear power plants because they could be bombed and the damage would be huge. We would be basically providing the bomb to hurt ourselves. If there could be an emergency alert very early when something goes wrong, and earlier determined escape routes so everyone could move out efficiently.
Anonymous said…
Chernobyl was one of the most devastating events in history. A priority at all times must be to prevent anything this dangerous from happening again. When people think of Chernobyl, it is tied with the people who were harmed by radiation and not so much with the harm to the environment. I think some necessary precautions that must be taken involve the government, and regulations/laws being passed. If there aren’t already, laws should be put in place to ensure that all measures are accounted for and that nothing is skipped over in the process of producing nuclear energy.
Anonymous said…
I think a huge problem with using nuclear energy is that it simply does not have enough people educated on the subject and it does not have enough funding to help test nuclear sources in areas where it is unpopulated. However, accidents like Chernobyl are extremely rare and only occurred due to its relatively new emergence as an energy source. Finding a way to provide some sort of radiation protection in nuclear energy power plant areas will be a precaution that has to be taken for human health safety and wildlife safety. I also think more research should be done regarding how to take action if an accident were to occur, and how to have to several back up plans in case an area is damaged. The biggest problem with Chernobyl was that it was a huge human error for not being prepared for such a large catastrophe.
Anonymous said…
I believe that nuclear power is the way to go. Based off of what I have learned nuclear energy reaps the most benefits vs the cons. Chernobyl was a freak accident in which laziness and human inconsiderance caused the problem. To prevent such events from ever happening again we can develop measures and create new technology to better prevent meltdowns in the future. To minimize the spread of radiation among populations we can quarantine the affected and have them live separately from others until they are deemed safe enough to rejoin their local community.
Anonymous said…
To make sure that Chernobyl never happens again, I think we need more trained professionals and people how really know about nuclear radiation. Given that it can take two to seven years of graduate studies to become fully trained, It can be hard for there to be any people how are trained There is no doubt that training, management and oversight are expensive. But the cost of establishing and maintaining these preventive measures is but a fraction of the cost of cleanup. This can truly help and make sure that Chernobyl never happens again.
Anonymous said…
we have been using nuclear energy as one of it’s main non renewable energy sources. The source of nuclear energy comes from nuclear power plants which efficiently generates large quantities of energy and has low greenhouse gas emissions, compared to traditional coal power plants. I thin we need to use all the available renewable sources there are cause we are running out of fossil fuels.
Anonymous said…
Nuclear energy is extremely dangerous to use, and no matter how cautious we are, there will always be risk of a meltdown. Radiation is so dangerous because it can’t be seen, it travels quickly, and its effects can be long term and even cause birth defects in the next generation. Considering that nuclear power is not sustainable since it’s non renewable, there’s no good way of transporting it, and it’s bad for the environment, I believe we should keep away from using nuclear energy. Spreading awareness about the potential dangers is key to promoting this. If we are to continue using it, we must be much smarter about how and where the plants are created. They need to be in remote, low risk areas, with several different safeguards in place in case of a meltdown. Putting a nuclear power plant on the coast in an earthquake and tsunami prone area was a disaster waiting to happen despite the “safety precautions” put in place.
Anonymous said…
Nuclear energy is dangerous. It's a renewable source of energy, but I don't think it is worth the risk, since no amount of precautions will completely take away the dangers. There are many other forms of renewable energy sources that are as efficient as nuclear. Governments and energy companies should not put citizens living nearby at risk of being harmed. I think that people should focus on other types of energy rather than trying to fix nuclear. But if a solution is found, I think that it could potentially be worth the trouble.
Amogh Gokhale said…
I think radiation is a force to be reckoned with, and it is important that we look at Chernobyl to see what could happen if not managed properly, and use it to understand what guidelines are necessary to prevent such a disaster from occurring again. However, if we are able to understand these risks and counteract them, we will be able to have a renewable source of energy that will allow us to cut our carbon emission substantially.
Anonymous said…
There have been no nuclear reactor accidents in the last eight years. I believe that we've perfected nuclear safety. Now, let's say there's another accident. To save civilian deaths, I see two solutions: a quick way of evacuation, which I believe is ineffective, as there's no way people can evacuate fast enough, or for every civilian to have hazmat suits so they can evacuate without time constraint. Now, an easier way to prevent civilian deaths is to not have civilians. The government can force there to be no residential areas or raise the price of housings near nuclear power plants.
Anonymous said…
There are many things that we can do to prevent future tragedies like the one in Chernobyl. Increased safety measures can be taken, such as more tests being conducted that may be able to detect possible sources of incidents. Russia was using unsafe practices when constructing their nuclear power plants, so they were more susceptible to accidents. Furthermore, steps can be take aside from the actual power plants. There should be a sizable buffer zone around the plant where no person can live so that if something were to occur, it will could cause a lot less damage to humans lives. Also, an evacuation plan should be established where everyone living near a reactor would be able to escape with a short amount of time, to lessen their exposure to the dangers presented from certain nuclear power plant accidents.
Anonymous said…
The Chernobyl accident acts as a warning and a lesson. Nuclear power is a viable renewable energy source that can help reduced our carbon footprint, but it also poses its own dangers. There should be significant buffer zones around every nuclear reactor that can help protect the environment in the case of an accident. There also needs to be more precautions in place to help prevent these damages. If we cant do this, then is nuclear power really safe?
Anonymous said…
What happened at Chernobyl could have definitely been prevented or could have been dealt with in a safer way. To ensure that tragedies like Chernobyl doesn’t happen is to take precaution and have everything dealt with in a safer manner. Nuclear energy is very dangerous itself so when creating the nuclear reactors or handling nuclear power, people should make sure everything is not harmful and ready to go.
Anonymous said…
Chernobyl was a horrible event that acts now as a warning to us. However, this incident could’ve definitely been prevented and dealt with in a better manner. Nuclear energy needs to be dealt with in a more careful way to prevent accidents from happening and damaging what we call home. We need to understand the risks to deal with them.

Popular posts from this blog

What's the deal with airline food?

What We Can Recycle

Land Pollution Is Not The Solution